| 1 |
"Paweł Hajdan, Jr." schrieb: |
| 2 |
> On 10/14/11 12:39 PM, Brian Harring wrote: |
| 3 |
>> On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 03:29:19PM -0400, Matt Turner wrote: |
| 4 |
>>> On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 3:16 PM, "Pawe?? Hajdan, Jr." |
| 5 |
>>> <phajdan.jr@g.o> wrote: |
| 6 |
>>>> OK, so what are the _blocking_ reasons for no EAPI 4 support in |
| 7 |
>>>> python.eclass yet? |
| 8 |
>>>> |
| 9 |
>>>> I understand you have some complicated patches in flight etc etc, but |
| 10 |
>>>> are they _required_ for the eclass not to break with EAPI 4? |
| 11 |
>>>> |
| 12 |
>>>> My point is that I'd like to use pkg_pretend in packages that use |
| 13 |
>>>> python.eclass and I can't (for a long time). Unless there are really |
| 14 |
>>>> important reasons like breakages I think we should really make |
| 15 |
>>>> python.eclass support EAPI=4. |
| 16 |
>>> |
| 17 |
>>> Two weeks and no response from python@? |
| 18 |
>> |
| 19 |
>> You probably should've cc'd them. |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> CC-ing python@ then (but I expect the developers to follow gentoo-dev |
| 22 |
> anyway). |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> In case of no response, I plan to submit the thing to the council |
| 25 |
> agenda. I think the parts of python eclass that I use should work with |
| 26 |
> EAPI 4. |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
What do you expect the council to do? |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
Neither you nor the council can force anyone to do anything. |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
The only thing you can do is to kindly ask about remaining issues and helping with solving them. And |
| 34 |
i am sure, that everyone would like to see some help to understand and improve the python eclass. :-) |
Archives