Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Jon Portnoy <avenj@g.o>
To: Rainer Groesslinger <rainer.groesslinger@×××.net>
Cc: gentoo-dev@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Is there a process for marking ebuilds stable?
Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2003 23:07:42
Message-Id: 20030413230737.GA18713@cerberus.oppresses.us
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Is there a process for marking ebuilds stable? by Rainer Groesslinger
On Mon, Apr 14, 2003 at 01:00:51AM +0200, Rainer Groesslinger wrote:
> On Monday 14 April 2003 00:25, Brad Laue wrote: > > Given the increasing size of the portage tree I'm becoming concerned > > about the rate at which ebuilds move from the unstable ~arch keyword to > > the stable one. > > correct, same here. > Additionally there are many ebuilds in the tree that should be removed > again...for example most of the game mods (not because I don't like gamers > just because e.g. osp for quake3 isn't maintained although quite some time > passed already since the last osp release(s) and in a multiplayer game it's > useless to have an old version of something ;)
Submit an updated ebuild.
> > > Has a formalized process been discussed for this? The first thing that > > comes to mind is a set of tinderboxes designed to build packages with > > predictable flags sending reports to each ebuild maintainer. > > Problem: Gentoo doesn't have maintainers ! > It has been discussed to introduce a MAINTAINER="xxxx@g.o" thing in the > ebuilds but it seems like the idea got dropped by the core developers (or > didn't even get attention, I don't know). > > The only real maintainer is carpaski for portage, most other packages are > worked on by more or less "Freelancers"... > Sure, many people are related to something, but you can't see who is the > maintainer of a certain package. > Just imagine...there are some packages where version 0.1 was submitted by dev > A, 0.2 by dev B and 0.2.1 by dev C and 0.3 again by dev B etc. >
Read changelogs.
> Not, that this is bad at all, but it would be much better to have "real" > maintainers like almost every other distribution has, too.
We have real maintainers. For example, I maintain a handful of packages. Could you be more specific about what constitutes a "real" maintainer?
> > > The second is more practical and within reach; advocacy of > > stable.gentoo.org, and a policy of accepting a package as stable when > > five or more users have vouched for it and two weeks have passed without > > a bug report. > > stable.gentoo.org is _great_ ! Thanks so much to blizzy (unfortunatly he's not > in the dev team any more). The problem here is that this site must be pushed > quite hard because there are packages in the tree only a few people use and > if those people don't use stable.gentoo.org they won't be stable anytime soon > or might - in a bad case - be pushed into stable because nobody complain > although it's just because nobody uses stable.gentoo.org >
-- Jon Portnoy avenj/irc.freenode.net -- gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Is there a process for marking ebuilds stable? Rainer Groesslinger <rainer.groesslinger@×××.net>