| 1 |
On 3/6/11 1:22 PM, Christian Ruppert wrote: |
| 2 |
> We're almost done with the preparation of bugzilla-4.x for bugs.gentoo.org. |
| 3 |
> So, do we want the new workflow or do we want to keep the old? |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
I like the new workflow more, mostly because of simplicity. This is also |
| 6 |
closer to what code.google.com uses, and my experience with it was very |
| 7 |
positive. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
Before we start arguing for and against various details, let's ask one |
| 10 |
simple question - are we actually using all those CLOSED and VERIFIED |
| 11 |
statuses, and what does it change that a bug is REOPENED vs. NEW. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Now one of the issues I can indeed understand is the CONFIRMED status |
| 14 |
vs. UNCONFIRMED. Still, I'm not sure whether we use UNCONFIRMED so much. |
| 15 |
Anyway, it should be possible to add UNCONFIRMED on top of the new |
| 16 |
workflow, right? |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Paweł Hajdan, Jr. |
Archives