From: | Kurt Lieber <klieber@g.o> |
---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@g.o |
Subject: | [gentoo-dev] policy for marking development branches of programs as stable? |
Date: | Sat, 19 Jul 2003 16:19:50 |
Message-Id: | 20030719161725.GA32440@mail.lieber.org |
1 | I just noticed that mutt-1.5.4-r1 was marked stable on x86. The 1.5 branch |
2 | of mutt is the development branch -- 1.4 is the stable branch, similar to |
3 | the 2.4/2.5 kernel series. |
4 | |
5 | It seems wrong to me that we would mark development branches of software as |
6 | stable. The mutt developers, who presumably know mutt much better than any |
7 | of us do, don't feel 1.5 is stable -- who are we to disagree? |
8 | |
9 | Do we have some sort of policy for this? If not, can we make one? |
10 | |
11 | --kurt |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-dev] policy for marking development branches of programs as stable? | Paul de Vrieze <pauldv@g.o> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] policy for marking development branches of programs as stable? | Lars Weiler <pylon@g.o> |