Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCHES] python-r1 suite clean up & impl reorder
Date: Wed, 09 Dec 2015 20:46:02
Message-Id: 20151209214502.7c32763b.mgorny@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] [PATCHES] python-r1 suite clean up & impl reorder by "Michał Górny"
1 On Sun, 6 Dec 2015 20:03:19 +0100
2 Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote:
3
4 > Hi,
5 >
6 > Here's another patchset. Mostly fixups inspired by multilib-build.eclass
7 > changes with a few little additions.
8 >
9 > Changes:
10 >
11 > 1. eclass-set variables are now read-only,
12 > 2. 'unset -f' is used to unset temporary & local functions,
13 > 3. implementations are reordered for sane order.
14 >
15 > I've tested this with a few dozen random distutils-r1, python-r1,
16 > python-any-r1 and python-single-r1 packages. However, for
17 > the implementation reorder a larger tinderbox run would be appreciated.
18 >
19 > As explained in the commit, the reorder may influence files installed by
20 > a package, and implementation selected by python_setup(). This should
21 > not cause issues for correctly written ebuilds, and should help us find
22 > those that are not correctly written ;-).
23 >
24 > In other words, we're finally considering Python 3.x preferred over
25 > Python 2.x.
26
27 Merged now.
28
29 --
30 Best regards,
31 Michał Górny
32 <http://dev.gentoo.org/~mgorny/>