| 1 |
On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 12:06 AM, Alice Ferrazzi <alicef@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> What about maintainers that are away without writing it in their |
| 4 |
> maintainer bug ? |
| 5 |
> After how many days of no replay can be fair to touch their package ? |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
I think we already have dev-away. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
If a maintainer marks themselves as devaway, my understanding is that |
| 11 |
they're expected to leave standing orders in place for how to handle their |
| 12 |
packages, and in default of that it could well be fair game. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
If a developer lapses long enough and doesn't use devaway properly to mark |
| 15 |
any waylaid packages as touchable...then that's probably an example of an |
| 16 |
even bigger fish to fry that undertakers would handle anyway. |
Archives