1 |
On Thu, 2004-08-12 at 23:17, Carsten Lohrke wrote: |
2 |
> > I can't actually say I've used MySQLAdmin, but I've found MySQL CC to be |
3 |
> > quite useful, so I'd rather not have to keep a local copy of the ebuild. |
4 |
> |
5 |
> That's a reason not to drop it. On the other hand, development stopped |
6 |
> upstream, so it will be removed at some time. I suppose you're using 0.9.4, |
7 |
> since there are bug reports regarding 0.9.3? |
8 |
|
9 |
Yes, I use 0.9.4. According to b.g.o, there are only 4 open bugs against |
10 |
mysqlcc (http://tinyurl.com/5lojj): |
11 |
|
12 |
#41794 (dev-db/mysqlcc-0.9.3 missing files and segfaults) appears to be |
13 |
fixed in 0.9.4, according to the comments (I never encountered the bug |
14 |
myself, even under 0.9.3). |
15 |
|
16 |
#57726 (mysqlcc failed to build) hasn't affected me. |
17 |
|
18 |
#29689 (mysqlcc returns error during table creation about missing |
19 |
syntax.txt at $HOME/syntax.txt) has an easy workaround, which only has |
20 |
to be performed once. |
21 |
|
22 |
#57308 (mysqlcc crashes strangely) hasn't affected me, since our tables |
23 |
remain static. That said, this is a rather serious bug, and I can see |
24 |
why you would like to remove mysqlcc from portage. |
25 |
|
26 |
It is indeed unfortunate that the MySQL team (upstream) have dropped |
27 |
support for their older products, while simultaneously claiming their |
28 |
replacements (MySQL Administrator and MySQL Query Browser) are not ready |
29 |
for production use. |
30 |
|
31 |
Cheers |
32 |
|
33 |
Andrew |
34 |
|
35 |
|
36 |
-- |
37 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |