| 1 |
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 2:24 AM, Ian Stakenvicius <axs@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> FYI - Spidermonkey is in the exact same situation -- upstream develops |
| 3 |
> with the expectation that projects will embed the code or at best |
| 4 |
> bundle the lib. They also completely break API with every major |
| 5 |
> version bump (ie, every 6 weeks). Fortunately they accepted patches |
| 6 |
> that support installing multiple versions concurrently, and so I've |
| 7 |
> started slotting it in the tree. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
On the other hand, I'm assuming non-core Mozilla projects and external |
| 10 |
projects rely only on ESR releases of Spidermonkey, such that the API |
| 11 |
only changes every 30 weeks or so? |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Cheers, |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Dirkjan |
Archives