1 |
Petteri Räty wrote: |
2 |
> On 07/18/2010 05:21 PM, Christian Faulhammer wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
>> Hi, |
5 |
>> |
6 |
>> Theo Chatzimichos<tampakrap@g.o>: |
7 |
>> |
8 |
>> |
9 |
>>> On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 9:06 AM, Christian Faulhammer |
10 |
>>> <fauli@g.o> wrote: |
11 |
>>> |
12 |
>>>> What about getting rid of -project? |
13 |
>>>> |
14 |
>>>> V-Li |
15 |
>>>> |
16 |
>>> WHAT? Why?? |
17 |
>>> |
18 |
>> Because it is useless in my eyes. All discussion could also take |
19 |
>> place here and most people mix it up anyway. The distinction is too |
20 |
>> blurry. |
21 |
>> |
22 |
>> V-Li |
23 |
>> |
24 |
>> |
25 |
> The "tone in gentoo" etc threads recently belonged to gentoo-project. |
26 |
> Those threads are usually the ones that grow the longest. If people want |
27 |
> those on gentoo-dev then gentoo-project is not needed. Granted most of |
28 |
> the time the list is not that active but so are many other mailing lists |
29 |
> we have. I don't think this is something we should have on the council |
30 |
> agenda without the issues having had it's own thread (on gentoo-project |
31 |
> according to current rules). |
32 |
> |
33 |
> Regards, |
34 |
> Petteri |
35 |
> |
36 |
> |
37 |
|
38 |
It always seemed to me that people want to send threads to -project for |
39 |
them to just go away. Once a thread goes to -project, it just whithers |
40 |
on the vine and nothing much happens. There may be a need for -project |
41 |
but if almost no one is going to be there, there is no point sending |
42 |
threads to it. Maybe developers should be required to subscribe to |
43 |
-project so that even if a thread is sent there, they still get to see |
44 |
the postings and deal with the issues that are being raised. |
45 |
|
46 |
Dale |
47 |
|
48 |
:-) :-) |