Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ricardo Loureiro <rjlouro@×××××××.org>
To: billk@×××××××××.au
Cc: Gentoo Developers <gentoo-dev@g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] *-config tool renaming?
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 23:24:54
Message-Id: 20031117232221.7762df54.rjlouro@rjlouro.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] *-config tool renaming? by William Kenworthy
1 On Tue, 18 Nov 2003 07:18:42 +0800
2 William Kenworthy <billk@×××××××××.au> wrote:
3
4 > I dont see a problem with branding in this case (other than gentoo-*
5 > sounding a bit ... odd!)
6 >
7 > how many other tools such as g-cpan.pl exist that few know about: is
8 > there a consolidated list of these tools and what they do? If not, some
9 > kind of consistent, hierarchal naming scheme will be a godsend!
10 >
11 > So I am suggesting
12 > g-update-etc, g-update-opengl
13 > g-install-cpan, g-install-cran
14 > g-config-distcc, g-config-java
15 > and so on
16
17 Since portage uses a lot of "e" based commands (emerge, ebuild) why not calling it econfig-* or econf-*?
18
19 Ricardo Loureiro
20
21 1024D/6B7C0EC0: BA28 B022 E0A9 03C5 9E5F 7BD7 25E3 CF69 6B7C 0EC0