Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Robin H. Johnson" <robbat2@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: Re: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2012 16:36:42
Message-Id: robbat2-20120601T163406-158197414Z@orbis-terrarum.net
In Reply to: Re: Re: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver by Rich Freeman
On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 11:53:52AM -0400, Rich Freeman wrote:
> However, Kent did point out the rebase function doesn't actually apply > new signatures to the "new old" commits anyway, so you'd end up with > unsigned commits in the history.
Only in your local history. The push to the central repo would only send the commits in the active chain to your branch HEAD. -- Robin Hugh Johnson Gentoo Linux: Developer, Trustee & Infrastructure Lead E-Mail : robbat2@g.o GnuPG FP : 11ACBA4F 4778E3F6 E4EDF38E B27B944E 34884E85

Replies

Subject Author
Re: Re: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver Kent Fredric <kentfredric@×××××.com>