Archives
Archives
| From: | "Robin H. Johnson" <robbat2@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: Re: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver | ||
| Date: | Fri, 01 Jun 2012 16:36:42 | ||
| Message-Id: | robbat2-20120601T163406-158197414Z@orbis-terrarum.net | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: Re: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver by Rich Freeman |
||
| 1 | On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 11:53:52AM -0400, Rich Freeman wrote: |
| 2 | > However, Kent did point out the rebase function doesn't actually apply |
| 3 | > new signatures to the "new old" commits anyway, so you'd end up with |
| 4 | > unsigned commits in the history. |
| 5 | Only in your local history. The push to the central repo would only send |
| 6 | the commits in the active chain to your branch HEAD. |
| 7 | |
| 8 | -- |
| 9 | Robin Hugh Johnson |
| 10 | Gentoo Linux: Developer, Trustee & Infrastructure Lead |
| 11 | E-Mail : robbat2@g.o |
| 12 | GnuPG FP : 11ACBA4F 4778E3F6 E4EDF38E B27B944E 34884E85 |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: Re: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver | Kent Fredric <kentfredric@×××××.com> |