1 |
On Sonntag, 24. April 2011, Michał Górny wrote: |
2 |
> On Sun, 24 Apr 2011 21:43:16 +0200 |
3 |
> |
4 |
> Matthias Schwarzott <zzam@g.o> wrote: |
5 |
> > Sounds like we should fix udev ebuild and some ebuilds installing |
6 |
> > udev rules to not use /$(get_libdir)/udev, but plain /lib/udev. |
7 |
> > |
8 |
> > I used that in believe that /lib is identical or links |
9 |
> > to /$(get_libdir) and multilib-strict requires it, but it seems to be |
10 |
> > intelligent enough to only deny 64-bit libs to go to /lib. |
11 |
> > |
12 |
> > So proper udev should use /lib/udev, correct? |
13 |
> |
14 |
> Do you really think it'd be fine for some systems to possibly |
15 |
> have /lib64 and /lib with random different contents? |
16 |
|
17 |
Well I was always under the impression that /lib64 and /lib did point to the |
18 |
same directory. |
19 |
Is the case where /lib is no symlink to /lib64 so frequent? |
20 |
|
21 |
Matthias |