Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ned Ludd <solar@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] adding a code of conduct
Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2006 00:06:38
Message-Id: 1144109035.28175.21.camel@localhost
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] adding a code of conduct by Danny van Dyk
1 On Tue, 2006-04-04 at 01:40 +0200, Danny van Dyk wrote:
2
3 ...
4
5
6 > If
7 > >you choose the latter option, please ensure members of the Infrastructure
8 > >project have reviewed and approved the proxy relationship to avoid having
9 > >access cut off for both developers.
10
11
12 Refresh your browser.
13
14
15 > It's infras job to enforce the permissions as given by devrel. If devrel says,
16 > somebody is allowed to commit in the main tree, nobody but devrel should be
17 > allowed to revoke this. The only exceptions are those case already stated
18 > above.
19
20 I think your understanding of how things work is a tad skewed here.
21
22
23 --
24 Ned Ludd <solar@g.o>
25 Gentoo Linux
26
27 --
28 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] adding a code of conduct "Jan Kundrát" <jkt@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] adding a code of conduct Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@g.o>