| 1 |
On Sun, 2022-07-03 at 15:45 -0400, Mike Gilbert wrote: |
| 2 |
> Calling ebegin here makes no sense because it is likely that the |
| 3 |
> called |
| 4 |
> function will also generate output. This will lead to the "[ ok ]" |
| 5 |
> potentially appearing many lines later. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> It also leads to nested ebegin calls, which make no sense for the |
| 8 |
> same |
| 9 |
> reason. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
I looked at this earlier and left this in because it makes sense to me |
| 12 |
to do it this way conceptually. That implies that our tools should |
| 13 |
supported nested ebegin calls and deal with multiline output, so for me |
| 14 |
the real issue to fix is there. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Right now that support isn't there, though, and if that isn't |
| 17 |
forthcoming soonish I have no objections to this patch if people feel |
| 18 |
that is the better approach (for now). |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Hans |
Archives