| 1 |
Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Tue, 18 Dec 2007 21:38:08 +0100 |
| 3 |
> Fabian Groffen <grobian@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
>> Just to have it spelt out, what you suggest here is that EAPI has a |
| 5 |
>> single value, a word or a number, that refers to a set of "features |
| 6 |
>> and rules", if I understand correctly. |
| 7 |
>> |
| 8 |
>> With this way of using EAPI I fail to see why EAPIs aren't orderable. |
| 9 |
>> Even with the example you gave in the previous mail, it looks like a |
| 10 |
>> perfect succession of EAPIs. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> It doesn't *have* to be a perfect succession. It's entirely possible |
| 13 |
> that there will be, say, two divergent EAPI branches or even that there |
| 14 |
> will be a completely unrelated new EAPI format. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
What's the point in having such thing? |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
lu |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Luca Barbato |
| 24 |
Gentoo Council Member |
| 25 |
Gentoo/linux Gentoo/PPC |
| 26 |
http://dev.gentoo.org/~lu_zero |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
-- |
| 29 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives