1 |
On 28 June 2012 13:03, Matt Turner <mattst88@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
> On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 1:54 PM, Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
>> On Sat, 23 Jun 2012 18:45:46 +0100 |
4 |
>> Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> wrote: |
5 |
>> |
6 |
>>> On Sat, 23 Jun 2012 19:43:10 +0200 |
7 |
>>> Pacho Ramos <pacho@g.o> wrote: |
8 |
>>> > > It treats -r300 as being newer than -r200, and so will treat "the |
9 |
>>> > > gtk3 version" or "the jruby version" as being newer versions of |
10 |
>>> > > "the gtk2 version" or "the ruby 1.8 version", just as it tries to |
11 |
>>> > > bring in a newer GCC and so on. |
12 |
>>> > |
13 |
>>> > And what problems is that causing for you? |
14 |
>>> |
15 |
>>> The problem is that there's no way of knowing that -r300 is not "a |
16 |
>>> newer version" than -r200 |
17 |
> |
18 |
> It's actually not though, is it? I think -r300 is simply the same |
19 |
> thing as -r200 except that it uses gtk3 instead of gtk2. |
20 |
|
21 |
What it means is that it's the same package and version, |
22 |
but a 100 revisions of the ebuild later. It makes one wonder |
23 |
what the heck is going on there... |
24 |
|
25 |
-- |
26 |
Cheers, |
27 |
|
28 |
Ben | yngwin |
29 |
Gentoo developer |
30 |
Gentoo Qt project lead |