| 1 |
On Monday 31 of December 2007 15:33:51 Marius Mauch wrote: |
| 2 |
> Still doesn't address my concerns, namely: |
| 3 |
> - silently expands the scope of EAPI beyond ebuild contents (which is a |
| 4 |
> blocker for me) |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
And what is the reason for not doing exactly that? Seems logical to me. And |
| 7 |
btw. slot deps added in EAPI 1 seems to have similiar impact, you can't use |
| 8 |
them in ebuilds using EAPI 0 nor in profiles/. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
> - doesn't mention compability issues on the dev side (minor) |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Aren't new EAPIs introducing the same problem already? Devs should use up to |
| 13 |
date tools, and especially the devs running some checks on the whole tree. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
-- |
| 16 |
Best Regards, |
| 17 |
Piotr Jaroszyński |
| 18 |
-- |
| 19 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives