| 1 |
On Tue, 2017-01-31 at 17:34 +0100, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 01/31/2017 03:50 PM, Georg Rudoy wrote: |
| 3 |
> > I'll make a new release of leechcraft itself and bump the version |
| 4 |
> > to |
| 5 |
> > that new one, so they'll naturally be dropped to unstable, 0.6.70 |
| 6 |
> > and |
| 7 |
> > earlier (if any) indeed could be removed. Most of the bugs, as I |
| 8 |
> > saw |
| 9 |
> > them, are due to the current last released version being 2.5 years |
| 10 |
> > old |
| 11 |
> > and obviously bitrotten somewhat since then. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> I'd still recommend spending a bit of time to consider whether this |
| 14 |
> doesn't fit better in an overlay, which would also make it easier to |
| 15 |
> maintain without overburdening proxy maint given the number of |
| 16 |
> packages |
| 17 |
> involved. |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
I really second this - we can ask infra to get you an overlay. Should |
| 21 |
it turn out that you are truly maintaining stuff, we can then merge it |
| 22 |
into the tree. |
Archives