| 1 |
On Sat, Nov 22, 2003 at 12:47:59AM -0600, Matthew Kennedy wrote: |
| 2 |
> Jon Portnoy <avenj@g.o> writes: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> Jon, |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> That's such a vague statement we have in the social contract. I've |
| 8 |
> always wondered what it meant specifically. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
I would assume it means that the core distribution - things like Portage |
| 11 |
- will not depend on nonfree software. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
In other words: you're never going to need bitkeeper to get the Portage |
| 14 |
tree. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
-- |
| 17 |
Jon Portnoy |
| 18 |
avenj/irc.freenode.net |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives