From: | Markus Ullmann <jokey@g.o> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | [gentoo-dev] Re: EAPI definition Was: [GLEP] Use EAPI-suffixed ebuilds (.ebuild-EAPI) | ||
Date: | Thu, 20 Dec 2007 21:24:47 | ||
Message-Id: | fkej6q$rku$1@ger.gmane.org | ||
In Reply to: | Re: EAPI definition Was: [gentoo-dev] [GLEP] Use EAPI-suffixed ebuilds (.ebuild-EAPI) by "Santiago M. Mola" |
1 | Santiago M. Mola wrote: |
2 | > On Dec 20, 2007 8:01 PM, Zhang Le <r0bertz@g.o> wrote: |
3 | >> Where is the detailed definition of those EAPI's? |
4 | > |
5 | > "0", "1" and any further official EAPI are defined in PMS. There's a |
6 | > svn repository at http://svn.repogirl.net/pms |
7 | |
8 | Erm no, PMS isn't officially until council made a decision on it (and |
9 | I'm not aware of one yet). |
10 | Currently "official" EAPIs are 0 and 1. |
11 | |
12 | Greetz |
13 | -Jokey |
File name | MIME type |
---|---|
signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: EAPI definition Was: [GLEP] Use EAPI-suffixed ebuilds (.ebuild-EAPI) | "Wulf C. Krueger" <philantrop@g.o> |