Archives
Archives
| From: | Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev <gentoo-dev@l.g.o> | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Keeping licenses around | ||
| Date: | Thu, 20 Dec 2012 21:24:46 | ||
| Message-Id: | CAGfcS_=VmPKJ+S_ULJzQztHfMZxbyKxMgjbHpS03+8sYYoYjuw@mail.gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Keeping licenses around by Zac Medico |
||
| 1 | On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 3:46 PM, Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 | > |
| 3 | > If only a small subset of licenses require it, then maybe we should just |
| 4 | > use dodoc on those licenses that require it. Saving all licenses could |
| 5 | > be overkill. |
| 6 | |
| 7 | Seems like a reasonable compromise. I would think such licenses would |
| 8 | be rare. I still think it is extralegal to try to require this, but |
| 9 | some would rather not take risks and I can appreciate that... |
| 10 | |
| 11 | Rich |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Keeping licenses around | Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> |