| 1 |
On Mon, 23 Jul 2007 21:55:16 +0200 |
| 2 |
Benedikt Boehm <hollow@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> On Fri, 20 Jul 2007 23:17:46 +0200 |
| 5 |
> Michael Hanselmann <hansmi@g.o> wrote: |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> > On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 10:05:23PM +0200, Benedikt Boehm wrote: |
| 8 |
> > > > qmail_base_install should be split in smaller functions, maybe |
| 9 |
> > > > with callbacks (if possible in bash). |
| 10 |
> > |
| 11 |
[...] |
| 12 |
> > |
| 13 |
> > > I'm not sure what you mean with "callbacks" here, maybe you can |
| 14 |
> > > elaborate? |
| 15 |
> > |
| 16 |
> > If we have a common part which cannot, due to whatever reason, be |
| 17 |
> > split into several functions, but we've to do something package |
| 18 |
> > specific in between, we need callbacks. Just a sample (might not |
| 19 |
> > work at all, I'm not that much into eclasses): |
| 20 |
> > |
| 21 |
[...] |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> i guess this could be done with some "eval" foo... going to run some |
| 24 |
> tests the next days |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
I figured that we can simply use declare to check if a function exists, |
| 28 |
so i implemented hooks for all install functions and provided a |
| 29 |
combined qmail_src_install that calls all install functions. |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
I also moved the unpack stuff back into the ebuilds, only genqmail |
| 32 |
and qmail-spp remain with a little unpack function in the eclass... |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
Bene |
| 35 |
-- |
| 36 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives