Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Jon Portnoy <avenj@g.o>
To: Luke-Jr <luke-jr@g.o>
Cc: gentoo-dev@g.o, Paul de Vrieze <pauldv@g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] License Checking
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2003 00:22:46
Message-Id: 20031128002244.GA31506@cerberus.oppresses.us
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] License Checking by Luke-Jr
1 On Thu, Nov 27, 2003 at 04:04:34PM +0000, Luke-Jr wrote:
2 > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
3 > Hash: SHA1
4 >
5 > On Thursday 27 November 2003 03:54 pm, Paul de Vrieze wrote:
6 > > I am personally of the stance that we should by default have something
7 > > like
8 > > ACCEPT_LICENSES="osi-approved nonfree"
9 > This is a bad default, as many users will *not* accept non-free licenses. I
10 > still think the best default (if we need a default at all) would be the
11 > minimal required for a stage3.
12
13 Whereas a _majority_ of users will want nonfree. And the point of
14 defaults is to cater to the majority, is it not?
15
16 --
17 Jon Portnoy
18 avenj/irc.freenode.net
19
20 --
21 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] License Checking Luke-Jr <luke-jr@g.o>