1 |
I kind of agree with both points here. :) Let me explain... |
2 |
|
3 |
If the RCx releases would use updated packages that are in the stable tree |
4 |
(ie. glibc 2.3.1, gcc 3.2.2, etc) I think people like Per, Nicholas, and |
5 |
myself would be a bit happier building and testing older systems. :) |
6 |
|
7 |
If they are in the stable tree why not? Could this be done in the rc4 release? |
8 |
|
9 |
Another keyword like BUILD_ACCEPT_KEYWORDS = x86 would probably satisfy those |
10 |
with the urge to be super on edge :) and could probably be done with min. |
11 |
effort in changes to the scripts to look for another keyword. Yes? No? maybe? |
12 |
Should I add it to the "bug" report? |
13 |
|
14 |
Robert |
15 |
|
16 |
|
17 |
On Sunday 16 March 2003 12:00 pm, Nicholas Hockey wrote: |
18 |
> if your by a river in florida chances yer in a swamp, or near a sink |
19 |
> hole, not a good place to lay the foundation of your house |
20 |
> |
21 |
> On Sun, 2003-03-16 at 14:49, Felipe Ghellar wrote: |
22 |
> > Nicholas Hockey wrote: |
23 |
> > > well there is a reason that the base system is set up a certain way, |
24 |
> > > it's so that when you do run the bootstrap it will compile, in Linux |
25 |
> > > there is no real "base system" as there is in freebsd, so the only |
26 |
> > > logical way around this is to build a good foundation, which is well |
27 |
> > > known to build a complete system, at the sacrifice of time. |
28 |
> > |
29 |
> > Ok, let's simulate the installation process... |
30 |
> > |
31 |
> > 1) I preapare everything according to the Install Guide |
32 |
> > 2) I set up my make.conf the way I want it, with ~x86 |
33 |
> > 3) I run bootstrap.sh; it ignores my "unstable" choice and builds a |
34 |
> > "stable" base system |
35 |
> > 4) I run emerge system and then complete the installation |
36 |
> > 5) later, I run emerge --sync and emerge -u --deep system; it now |
37 |
> > follows my "unstable" choice and brings in all those packages |
38 |
> > bootstrap.sh ignored |
39 |
> > |
40 |
> > The net result is just that "sacrifice of time" you mentioned... |
41 |
> > |
42 |
> > > or they could do it your way, by the way i have some cheap land in |
43 |
> > > Florida, right next to the river, i'll sell it to you, by your |
44 |
> > > standards it should be a great place to build a house |
45 |
> > > |
46 |
> > > (sorry if this sounds rude i just thought this would be a good |
47 |
> > > comparison) |
48 |
> > |
49 |
> > Sorry, I don't get your point... (and I did't take it as rude) |
50 |
> > |
51 |
> > Felipe Ghellar |
52 |
|
53 |
|
54 |
-- |
55 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |