Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Lisa Seelye <lisa@g.o>
To: sj7trunks@g.o
Cc: david@×××××××××.com, Gentoo Dev <gentoo-dev@g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Maintaining production systems - and losing ebuilds
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2003 18:24:59
Message-Id: 1068575117.11516.2678.camel@lisa.thedoh.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Maintaining production systems - and losing ebuilds by Benjamin Coles
1 On Tue, 2003-11-11 at 12:36, Benjamin Coles wrote:
2 > It's an effort to get a stable tree out there that doesn't change much. We
3 > had a few people from IBM that said they would love to change to gentoo
4 > but the portage changes too quickly and they can't risk emerging something
5 > and having it break afterwards. There are many more factors in
6 > implementating this but it's still in the planning stages.
7
8
9 Sounds like just a slower changing rsync tree, based on the stable.g.o
10 motif.
11
12
13 --
14 Regards,
15 -Lisa
16 <Vix ulla tam iniqua pax, quin bello vel aequissimo sit potior>

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies