1 |
On Tue, 2003-11-11 at 12:36, Benjamin Coles wrote: |
2 |
> It's an effort to get a stable tree out there that doesn't change much. We |
3 |
> had a few people from IBM that said they would love to change to gentoo |
4 |
> but the portage changes too quickly and they can't risk emerging something |
5 |
> and having it break afterwards. There are many more factors in |
6 |
> implementating this but it's still in the planning stages. |
7 |
|
8 |
|
9 |
Sounds like just a slower changing rsync tree, based on the stable.g.o |
10 |
motif. |
11 |
|
12 |
|
13 |
-- |
14 |
Regards, |
15 |
-Lisa |
16 |
<Vix ulla tam iniqua pax, quin bello vel aequissimo sit potior> |