Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Samuli Suominen <ssuominen@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-im/qutecom: metadata.xml ChangeLog qutecom-2.2_p20110210.ebuild
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2011 23:59:11
Message-Id: 4E9629A7.3080405@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-im/qutecom: metadata.xml ChangeLog qutecom-2.2_p20110210.ebuild by "Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn"
On 10/13/2011 02:27 AM, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote:
> Mike Frysinger schrieb: >>> The removed qutecom ebuild was not broken at any time. >> >> by splitting my reply, you changed the meaning. having qutecom in the tree >> with a depend on versions that i'm now removing breaks the depgraph. > > The depgraph is broken after the old versions are removed, not before.
I'm not sure if you should have gentoo-x86 access anymore... This is scary.

Replies