| 1 |
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 6:43 PM, Steve Dibb <beandog@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 07/14/2010 05:27 PM, Paul Arthur wrote: |
| 3 |
>> |
| 4 |
>> On 2010-07-14, William Hubbs<williamh@g.o> wrote: |
| 5 |
>> |
| 6 |
>>> On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 08:48:25PM +0200, Thomas Beierlein wrote: |
| 7 |
>>> |
| 8 |
>>>> On Wed, 14 Jul 2010 12:27:47 -0500 William Hubbs |
| 9 |
>>>> <williamh@g.o> wrote: =20 |
| 10 |
>>>> |
| 11 |
>>>>> All, =20 I have recently noticed that our amateur radio |
| 12 |
>>>>> applications are in the category media-radio. =20 Amateur Radio |
| 13 |
>>>>> is not considered part of the media, so I would like to propose |
| 14 |
>>>>> renaming this category to app-hamradio, or possibly moving the |
| 15 |
>>>>> amateur radio applications to app-hamradio if there are things in |
| 16 |
>>>>> media-radio which are not amateur radio related. =20 |
| 17 |
>>>> |
| 18 |
>>>> I like the idea very much. But I am an radio amateur and therefore |
| 19 |
>>>> I am a little bit biased :). I was always confused to find them in |
| 20 |
>>>> media-radio. If we do the move please count on me. |
| 21 |
>>> |
| 22 |
>>> I am an amateur radio operator as well, and that is why putting the |
| 23 |
>>> ham radio apps in"media-radio" bothers me. Ham radio is not part |
| 24 |
>>> of the media. |
| 25 |
>> |
| 26 |
>> But it is a medium. media-* has nothing to do with "the media"; I |
| 27 |
>> really don't see any point to this proposed change.. |
| 28 |
>> |
| 29 |
> |
| 30 |
> I say go for it. media-radio should be for V4L2 apps, mostly, that use it. |
| 31 |
> The remaining two can either go into media-tv or app-misc or some other |
| 32 |
> fitting category. |
| 33 |
> |
| 34 |
> Steve |
| 35 |
> |
| 36 |
> |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
Nope, v4l/v4l2 goes in media-tv, fm-radio applications seem to live in |
| 39 |
media-sound (except media-radio/{fmio,radiotray}, which look |
| 40 |
miscategorized). |
Archives