Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Chip Parker <infowolfe@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: rfc: amateur radio applications should not be in media-radio
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2010 10:53:46
Message-Id: AANLkTintYTXX_tbtIpec0f9u8kZIHclaLSA7oxqQCFcW@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: rfc: amateur radio applications should not be in media-radio by Steve Dibb
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 6:43 PM, Steve Dibb <beandog@g.o> wrote:
> On 07/14/2010 05:27 PM, Paul Arthur wrote: >> >> On 2010-07-14, William Hubbs<williamh@g.o>  wrote: >> >>> On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 08:48:25PM +0200, Thomas Beierlein wrote: >>> >>>> On Wed, 14 Jul 2010 12:27:47 -0500 William Hubbs >>>> <williamh@g.o>  wrote: =20 >>>> >>>>> All, =20 I have recently noticed that our amateur radio >>>>> applications are in the category media-radio. =20 Amateur Radio >>>>> is not considered part of the media, so I would like to propose >>>>> renaming this category to app-hamradio, or possibly moving the >>>>> amateur radio applications to app-hamradio if there are things in >>>>> media-radio which are not amateur radio related. =20 >>>> >>>> I like the idea very much. But I am an radio amateur and therefore >>>> I am a little bit biased :). I was always confused to find them in >>>> media-radio. If we do the move please count on me. >>> >>> I am an amateur radio operator as well, and that is why putting the >>> ham radio apps in"media-radio" bothers me. Ham radio is not part >>> of the media. >> >> But it is a medium.  media-* has nothing to do with "the media"; I >> really don't see any point to this proposed change.. >> > > I say go for it.  media-radio should be for V4L2 apps, mostly, that use it. >  The remaining two can either go into media-tv or app-misc or some other > fitting category. > > Steve > >
Nope, v4l/v4l2 goes in media-tv, fm-radio applications seem to live in media-sound (except media-radio/{fmio,radiotray}, which look miscategorized).