| 1 |
On 11/22/2012 10:45 PM, Patrick Lauer wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 11/20/12 21:57, Alexis Ballier wrote: |
| 3 |
>> On Fri, 16 Nov 2012 09:10:51 +0000 (UTC) |
| 4 |
>> "Patrick Lauer (patrick)" <patrick@g.o> wrote: |
| 5 |
>> |
| 6 |
>>> patrick 12/11/16 09:10:51 |
| 7 |
>>> |
| 8 |
>>> Modified: ChangeLog |
| 9 |
>>> Added: lyx-2.0.5.ebuild |
| 10 |
>>> Log: |
| 11 |
>>> Bump |
| 12 |
>>> |
| 13 |
>> |
| 14 |
>> |
| 15 |
>> |
| 16 |
>> While the bump was fine, please read the damn metadata.xml when you |
| 17 |
>> touch a package you're not used to. Pavel has been doing a very good |
| 18 |
>> job in (proxy) maintaining lyx since years and you do not seem to have |
| 19 |
>> contacted him before doing the bump, which is a bit disrespectful for |
| 20 |
>> him IMHO. |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> I disagree. A fix is a fix, a bump is a bump, no ego involved. |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
>> If you want to help in having things done quicker because I'm not |
| 25 |
>> always responsive enough, then please do it correctly and ask Pavel to |
| 26 |
>> CC you when he sends me instructions for lyx. |
| 27 |
> I dislike this territorialism. Why add a single point of failure to |
| 28 |
> package maintenance? (What if you or Pavel "disappear" for any reason?) |
| 29 |
> |
| 30 |
> Have fun, |
| 31 |
> |
| 32 |
> Patrick |
| 33 |
> |
| 34 |
> |
| 35 |
Generally I think contacting the maintainer is nice, I typically set a |
| 36 |
timeout (depending on severity) so that if they don't respond you do |
| 37 |
what is needed. |
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
-- |
| 40 |
-- Matthew Thode (prometheanfire) |
Archives