From: | Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Future EAPI feature Request/RFC: ^^( ) for [RP]?DEPEND | ||
Date: | Tue, 03 Jul 2012 09:14:23 | ||
Message-Id: | 20120703080859.2e4611b2@googlemail.com | ||
In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] Future EAPI feature Request/RFC: ^^( ) for [RP]?DEPEND by Kent Fredric |
1 | On Tue, 3 Jul 2012 15:44:04 +1200 |
2 | Kent Fredric <kentfredric@×××××.com> wrote: |
3 | > Firstly, we already have a ^^( ) syntax for REQUIRED_USE , "one of, |
4 | > but not more than one of". |
5 | |
6 | A user has a and b installed. c depends upon ^^ ( a b ). The user tries |
7 | to install c. What happens? |
8 | |
9 | -- |
10 | Ciaran McCreesh |
File name | MIME type |
---|---|
signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-dev] Future EAPI feature Request/RFC: ^^( ) for [RP]?DEPEND | Kent Fredric <kentfredric@×××××.com> |