Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Zhang Le <r0bertz@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [GLEP] Use EAPI-suffixed ebuilds (.ebuild-EAPI)
Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2007 17:28:42
Message-Id: 476D48AC.1020305@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [GLEP] Use EAPI-suffixed ebuilds (.ebuild-EAPI) by Richard Freeman
1 Richard Freeman wrote:
2 > Fernando J. Pereda wrote:
3 >> On Sat, Dec 22, 2007 at 06:01:04PM +0800, Zhang Le wrote:
4 >>> All could be get before sourcing.
5 >>> I know you'd say people will use all syntaxes to define. But how many are
6 >>> there? EAPI=1, EAPI="1" these are the two ways currently used in tree.
7 >>> A simple qgrep can show that.
8 >>> Two steps can guarantee you get the value
9 >>> 1. strip "
10 >>> 2. get the value
11 >> And then you are stuck FOREVER into defining EAPI as a variable.
12 >>
13 >
14 > And with the proposed GLEP you are stuck FOREVER into defining EAPI as
15 > part of the filename. What's the difference?
16
17 Ditto.
18
19 >
20 >> You clearly haven't read anything on this thread. I suggest you go and
21 >> do so before making a fool of yourself again. Please.
22
23 If I haven't read previous posts, then I would not participate in this
24 discussion in the first place. I have read a lot and feel like I should say
25 something so that my previous reading are not totally wasted.
26
27
28 --
29 Zhang Le, Robert
30 GPG key ID: 1E4E2973
31 Fingerprint: 0260 C902 B8F8 6506 6586 2B90 BC51 C808 1E4E 2973
32 --
33 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list