Archives
Archives
| From: | foser <foser@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites for dev-util/cccc | ||
| Date: | Sat, 15 Apr 2006 10:58:39 | ||
| Message-Id: | 1145098556.17585.2.camel@rivendell | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites for dev-util/cccc by Mike Frysinger |
||
| 1 | On Sat, 2006-04-15 at 02:54 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 2 | > cccc-3.1.4 now in portage |
| 3 | |
| 4 | Why did you add that, without adding metadata ? That is just wrong. |
| 5 | |
| 6 | It is better to remove it if there is no maintainer, you upping it |
| 7 | without adding yourself as maintainer is no form of maintenance. This is |
| 8 | exactly why we get complaints about a stale tree. |
| 9 | |
| 10 | I still say it should be removed in 30 days. |
| 11 | |
| 12 | - foser |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites for dev-util/cccc | Mark Loeser <halcy0n@g.o> |