| 1 |
On Fri, 11 Nov 2016 02:31:29 +0100 |
| 2 |
Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> Also note that the suggested set of operators is incomplete. There are |
| 5 |
> "<== less than or equal to" and ">== greater than or equal to", but |
| 6 |
> the corresponding ones for "less than" and "greater than" are missing. |
| 7 |
> So this would remove part of the existing functionality. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
Which was quite thoroughly explained. But I can repeat it for you if |
| 10 |
you insist: revisions are countable, so there's really no problem in |
| 11 |
doing >== -r2 instead of > -r1, and <== -r2 instead of < -r3. With the |
| 12 |
*== forms being IMHO cleaner since you clearly indicate the range of |
| 13 |
revisions, without making someone wonder whether you didn't |
| 14 |
accidentally forget = in there. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
-- |
| 17 |
Best regards, |
| 18 |
Michał Górny |
| 19 |
<http://dev.gentoo.org/~mgorny/> |
Archives