| 1 |
On Sat, 01 Nov 2008 18:30:41 +0100 |
| 2 |
Jose Luis Rivero <yoswink@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> Ryan Hill wrote: |
| 5 |
> > In anticipation of getting GCC 4.3 stabilized sometime, I'd like to |
| 6 |
> > ask maintainers check if their current stable packages build with |
| 7 |
> > 4.3, and if not please stabilize a version that does in the near |
| 8 |
> > future if at all possible. Stabilizing this version is going to be |
| 9 |
> > a huge job due to the number of packages that don't compile due to |
| 10 |
> > implicit C++ standard library header dependencies that got cleaned |
| 11 |
> > up in 4.3.[i], so anything you could do ahead of time to save our |
| 12 |
> > sanity would be greatly appreciated. |
| 13 |
> > |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> What version is the candidate to reach stable? 4.3.2? |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
I don't know, that's up to the toolchain guys. Probably the latest |
| 18 |
version available when the tree is ready, which I'm expecting will take |
| 19 |
quite some time. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
gcc-porting, by design, by neglect |
| 24 |
treecleaner, for a fact or just for effect |
| 25 |
wxwidgets @ gentoo EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 0662 |
Archives