1 |
On Thursday 27 November 2003 16:19, Luke-Jr wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> > Can we get some statistical data on this? |
4 |
> Since Portage as it is right now doesn't pay any attention to licenses, its |
5 |
> legality could be questioned (as with the games issue before?) |
6 |
|
7 |
If you want a hand count, I do want to use non-free software, and I do want to |
8 |
read every non-free license before installing something. |
9 |
|
10 |
> > and if you choose to restrict |
11 |
> > yourself to only free software or other licensing scheme, you can make |
12 |
> > the necessary changes yourself. Otherwise you will have a ton of users |
13 |
> > asking "why can't i emerge package foo?", or filing bugs because of this, |
14 |
> > etc. |
15 |
> |
16 |
> If Portage displays a clear enough message, there shouldn't be a problem |
17 |
> with this... |
18 |
|
19 |
We could further reduce the effort needed by having a switch to portage to get |
20 |
it to interactively prompt the user to accept any outstanding licenses, and |
21 |
allow portage to update ACCEPT_LICENSES in the same way it updates the world |
22 |
file. |
23 |
|
24 |
-- |
25 |
Toby Dickenson |
26 |
|
27 |
|
28 |
-- |
29 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |