| 1 |
On 30 December 2012 00:13, Brian Dolbec <dolsen@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sat, 2012-12-29 at 16:42 +0800, Ben de Groot wrote: |
| 3 |
>> On 27 December 2012 00:39, Kent Fredric <kentfredric@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 4 |
>> > Can we short cut the whole quiz process and have some "Inbound" repository |
| 5 |
>> > until we're full git, which people can fork/commit/pull and trusted people |
| 6 |
>> > can review submitted branches and apply them to CVS? |
| 7 |
>> |
| 8 |
>> This is why I started https://github.com/yngwin/proxy-maint/ |
| 9 |
>> Feel free to send pull requests my way. I have been very busy lately |
| 10 |
>> with work, so I am a bit behind on my Gentoo stuff, but I should be back |
| 11 |
>> in full swing soon. |
| 12 |
>> |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> Not to sidetrack the topic farther, but isn't this best done in our |
| 15 |
> github/gentoo account. It is one of the main reasons we have it, to |
| 16 |
> easily accept pull requests from users. It would also make it easier |
| 17 |
> for more devs to participate in a group proxy-maint repo. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
I started this repo as a private initiative to deal with some of my |
| 20 |
proxy maintainers. If other devs find it useful, I'm happy to move it |
| 21 |
to the Gentoo organization account on github. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Another reason I didn't do that so far, is that I was told infra is |
| 24 |
looking into setting up an integral solution to mirror our official |
| 25 |
overlays on github. It's been a while though, so it would be nice to |
| 26 |
hear some news on that. I find the github web interface a lot more |
| 27 |
convenient that the one we have on git.overlays.gentoo.org, so I'm |
| 28 |
rather anxious for us to start using github more. |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
-- |
| 31 |
Cheers, |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
Ben | yngwin |
| 34 |
Gentoo developer |
| 35 |
Gentoo Qt project lead, Gentoo Wiki admin |
Archives