Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Arun Raghavan <ford_prefect@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-im/qutecom: metadata.xml ChangeLog qutecom-2.2_p20110210.ebuild
Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2011 03:30:57
Message-Id: CAO38tUqs8-tiRFNVYtTb5VyzW+X4fEYXav-AcXpjRaBEce6G-w@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-im/qutecom: metadata.xml ChangeLog qutecom-2.2_p20110210.ebuild by Samuli Suominen
On 2 October 2011 13:50, Samuli Suominen <ssuominen@g.o> wrote:
> On 10/02/2011 02:44 AM, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote:
[...]
>> Bug 361181 is certainly on my TODO list, just not very high up to now. >> If you think that there is some urgency in getting rid of the package, >> please do explain so in advance. > > The time ran out with opening of http://bugs.gentoo.org/384733 for > linux-headers reverse deps to be tracked stable. > > I've removed qutecom for you again.
Removing the package again seems to just be unnecessary when the maintainer has stated that he'll fix the problem. Would masking it till it was fixed not suffice? Seems like a bit unjustified to me (from information on this thread alone). Cheers, -- Arun Raghavan http://arunraghavan.net/ (Ford_Prefect | Gentoo) & (arunsr | GNOME)

Replies