Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Rémi Cardona" <remi@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Should we disable RESOLVED LATER from bugzilla?
Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2010 05:48:55
Message-Id: 4BBACAE5.8020400@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Should we disable RESOLVED LATER from bugzilla? by "Petteri Räty"
1 Le 03/04/2010 11:50, Petteri Räty a écrit :
2 > I don't think later is valid resolution. If there's a valid bug it just
3 > means it's never looked at again. If the bug is not valid then a
4 > different resolution should be used. So what do you think about
5 > disabling later? I would like to avoid things like this:
6 >
7 > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113121#c21
8 >
9 > Not applicable to the bug above but in general our social contract says:
10 > "We will not hide problems"
11
12 You're basically blaming LATER and other resolutions for users failing
13 to *search* correctly.
14
15 How about changing how users search instead?
16
17 Let's make the small search box search for ALL bugs instead of just
18 opened ones. *That* should help tremendously.
19
20 That, and what Mart suggested. That's a good idea too.
21
22 Cheers,
23
24 Rémi

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Should we disable RESOLVED LATER from bugzilla? Maciej Mrozowski <reavertm@×××××.com>
Re: [gentoo-dev] Should we disable RESOLVED LATER from bugzilla? "Michał Górny" <gentoo@××××××××××.pl>