Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Petteri Räty" <betelgeuse@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Handling of keywording bugs with only one arch
Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2010 09:22:36
Message-Id: 4B9CAA89.2030503@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Re: Handling of keywording bugs with only one arch by Ryan Hill
On 03/14/2010 10:56 AM, Ryan Hill wrote:
> On Sat, 13 Mar 2010 19:07:41 +0200 > Petteri Räty <betelgeuse@g.o> wrote: > >> When a bug is marked as fixed it doesn't show up in searches developers >> use so it's a matter of who reads the email and acts upon it. I don't >> see why maintainers would be any more likely to act than an arch team >> comprised of multiple people in the case of bigger arches. > > Hasn't the running theme for the last couple weeks been about not touching > packages you don't maintain and aren't throughly familiar with? ;) > > Anyways, it's simply not the arch team's job to fix the issues that pop up > unless they somehow caused them. If there's a bug in the ebuild an arch > tester missed it's the maintainer who is responsible for fixing it. >
You misunderstood what I meant. The action I am talking about is reopening the bug. Any developer who notices that a bug should be reopened should reopen it so it gets noticed. Regards, Petteri

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
[gentoo-dev] Re: Handling of keywording bugs with only one arch Ryan Hill <dirtyepic@g.o>