1 |
On Friday, February 11, 2011 08:44:04 PM Mike Frysinger wrote: |
2 |
> On Friday, February 11, 2011 18:33:32 Alexis Ballier wrote: |
3 |
> > On Friday, February 11, 2011 05:07:50 PM Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: |
4 |
> > > Il giorno ven, 11/02/2011 alle 16.51 -0300, Alexis Ballier ha scritto: |
5 |
> > > > you are seriously considering patching every single package using |
6 |
> > > > libpng like |
7 |
> > > > this instead of fixing those that fail??? (and i'm not talking about |
8 |
> > > > the fact |
9 |
> > > > that these patches cannot be upstreamed...) |
10 |
> > > |
11 |
> > > Why not? We're *not* inventing the libpng15 thing at all... |
12 |
> > |
13 |
> > as i read it, it's breaking the libpng.so/pc thing however... |
14 |
> |
15 |
> so why dont you ask the libpng upstream people ? |
16 |
|
17 |
ask what ? |
18 |
"pretty please dont install libpng.pc/.so, pretty please force every consumer |
19 |
to hardcode the version because i know people that want to do this" ? |
20 |
|
21 |
Thanks, I'm fine with having it non slotted. |
22 |
|
23 |
A. |