Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Stefan Schweizer <genstef@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Is the autotools mess solvable?
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 22:08:05
Message-Id: e79639220601111403x5af9deb2u21b6285c2eea66ee@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Is the autotools mess solvable? by "Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò"
1 On 1/11/06, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò <flameeyes@g.o> wrote:
2 > It's a compromise, we trade perfectly stated deps for a lot of easyness for
3 > devs.. It's not a perfect world, you all know.
4
5
6 We do not have perfect depends in portage
7 For example we are missing out all deps in "system" usually.
8 And I do not see a problem with omitting autotools deps, because
9 autotools is in system.
10
11 Read "Implicit System Dependency" on
12 http://dev.gentoo.org/~plasmaroo/devmanual//general-concepts/dependencies/
13 for reference.
14
15 Regards,
16 Stefan
17
18 --
19 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Is the autotools mess solvable? "Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò" <flameeyes@g.o>