| 1 |
On Monday 21 May 2012 18:16:25 Markos Chandras wrote: |
| 2 |
> Excuse me but the way this change was handled is a bit depressing. |
| 3 |
> First, the ebuilds should have been fixed to inherit eutils and then |
| 4 |
> remove eutils from autotools. Now, a bunch of ebuilds are broken out |
| 5 |
> of nowhere. I don't believe this issue was that urgent in order to |
| 6 |
> justify the significant breakage of portage tree. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
you're assuming the breakage was intentional. i also wouldn't really describe |
| 9 |
it as "significant", but that's just quibbling over an insignificant aspect. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
but what's done is done. fix the ebuilds and move on. |
| 12 |
-mike |
Archives