Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <zx2c4@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] mbox -- looks sort of interesting
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 00:36:38
Message-Id: CAHmME9q00KOYsoz+JDtxaZy-cCbQKQdYYLOnjrRvqPSQbD8yjQ@mail.gmail.com
1 Hey folks,
2
3 Late night clicking-while-drooling, I came across something a few
4 minutes ago that mildly piqued my interest -- mbox
5 <http://pdos.csail.mit.edu/mbox/>. It's a sandbox that uses a
6 combination of ptrace and seccomp bpf; neither ours nor exherbo's uses
7 both of these together. The killer feature, for us, that's motivating
8 me to write to this list, is that it creates a "shadow file system",
9 and then has the option to commit the changes of that file system to
10 the real file system, piece by piece, when the process is done. It
11 made me think of some discussions we had at FOSDEM about Portage
12 evolution and whatnot. I haven't looked at this tool past an initial
13 glance, but it does look like interesting food for thought.
14
15 Jason
16
17 --
18 Jason A. Donenfeld
19 Gentoo Linux Security & Infrastructure
20 zx2c4@g.o
21 www.zx2c4.com

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] mbox -- looks sort of interesting Michael Haubenwallner <haubi@g.o>
[gentoo-dev] Re: mbox -- looks sort of interesting Michael Palimaka <kensington@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] mbox -- looks sort of interesting justin <jlec@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] mbox -- looks sort of interesting "Wulf C. Krueger" <wk@×××××××××××.de>