| 1 |
On Wed, 2 Nov 2016 07:43:04 +0100 |
| 2 |
Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> On Tue, 1 Nov 2016 23:09:25 +0000 |
| 5 |
> Sergei Trofimovich <slyfox@g.o> wrote: |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> > On Tue, 1 Nov 2016 14:16:18 +0100 |
| 8 |
> > Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote: |
| 9 |
> > |
| 10 |
> > > However, while at it I should |
| 11 |
> > > point out that the spec doesn't really cover pure-DEPEND :=, so there |
| 12 |
> > > is no guarantee that Haskell := operators will work at all. |
| 13 |
> > |
| 14 |
> > Yeah. It settled mostly because DEPEND="$RDEPEND + foo" is idiomatic |
| 15 |
> > at least in non ':=' world and no tools complained about ':=' in DEPEND. |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> No, it's allowed because of DEPEND=$RDEPEND. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
I'm guessing (again) I should read it as "syntax-wise they are defined by the |
| 20 |
same grammar". |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
> However, DEPEND without RDEPEND is not guaranteed to do anything useful. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
I'm not aware of any haskell ebuilds that set ':=' only in DEPEND but not |
| 25 |
propagate it to RDEPEND. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
Crude hack |
| 28 |
gentoo/metadata/md5-cache $ for f in */*; do if egrep -q '^DEPEND=.*:=' $f; then if ! egrep -q '^RDEPEND=.*:=' $f; then echo $f; fi; fi; done |
| 29 |
reports a few unrelated packages. |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
-- |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
Sergei |
Archives