Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-im/qutecom: metadata.xml ChangeLog qutecom-2.2_p20110210.ebuild
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2011 13:14:46
Message-Id: 20111013141311.159864a3@googlemail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-im/qutecom: metadata.xml ChangeLog qutecom-2.2_p20110210.ebuild by "Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn"
On Thu, 13 Oct 2011 12:23:07 +0200
Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn <chithanh@g.o> wrote:
> So qutecom is not broken and needs not be removed as long as > <linux-headers-2.6.38 is in the tree.
Dependencies using <, <=, =, ~ or =* are broken, except in certain special situations inside ||. -- Ciaran McCreesh

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies