| 1 |
On Friday 31 of October 2008 19:41:26 Doug Goldstein wrote: |
| 2 |
> Dawid Węgliński wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On Friday 31 of October 2008 19:17:45 Doug Goldstein wrote: |
| 4 |
> >> Marius Mauch wrote: |
| 5 |
> >>> On Fri, 31 Oct 2008 10:52:59 -0400 |
| 6 |
> >>> |
| 7 |
> >>> Doug Goldstein <cardoe@g.o> wrote: |
| 8 |
> >>>> Someone remind me again why we have the kerberos USE flag enabled by |
| 9 |
> >>>> default? |
| 10 |
> >>> |
| 11 |
> >>> AFAIK it was added so that the default profile provides support for |
| 12 |
> >>> joining a Windows domain (same for the ldap flag). |
| 13 |
> >> |
| 14 |
> >> So let's use EAPI=1 in just the samba ebuild and do +kerberos in there. |
| 15 |
> > |
| 16 |
> > samba needs USE="ads ldap" to join NT domain. |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> heh. You beat me to the punch. I was just about to say that samba |
| 19 |
> doesn't have a kerberos USE flag. |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> So any objections to me nuking this USE flag pronto? |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
I'd be +1 to drop kerberos useflag, and probably make use of eapi1 in |
| 24 |
nfs-utils and such, where kerberos would be more apropriate. |
Archives