| 1 |
On 25/01/11 22:33, Lars Wendler wrote: |
| 2 |
> Hi, |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> I don'f feel very well with this idea especially because no matter how hard I |
| 5 |
> try I don't get comfortable with EAPI-3. No offense to our prefix guys, you |
| 6 |
> surely did a hell of a good job and EAPI-3 seems to really get you out of |
| 7 |
> quite some trouble you had with earlier EAPIs, but... |
| 8 |
> I for myself never tried a prefix installation and I don't have any intentions |
| 9 |
> to do this in the foreseeable future so I still prefer EAPI-2 wherever I can |
| 10 |
> simply because EAPI-3 imposes overhead on my side which I have no real benefit |
| 11 |
> from and I have no real clue about how to write proper EAPI-3 ebuilds. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
You can use EAPI=3 completely independent from prefix support. |
Archives