Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ben Kohler <bkohler@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items -- Council meeting 2013-01-08
Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2012 03:06:23
Message-Id: CANSUr=+W+y6CJXHS3DapejBLeSz44H8_+jELh9zbt+p2GbxDOw@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items -- Council meeting 2013-01-08 by "Andreas K. Huettel"
1 On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 5:40 PM, Andreas K. Huettel <dilfridge@g.o>wrote:
2
3 > 2) Deprecate the 10.0 profiles NOW by removing them from profiles.desc and
4 > putting the new 13.0 profiles there. This has absolutely no effect on
5 > running
6 > installations.
7 >
8 > 3) Make a news item about removal of 10.0 profiles in a year /
9 > ${TIMESCALE}.
10 >
11 > 4) One ${TIMESCALE} later, remove 10.0 profiles. This is the ugly part, and
12 > users need to be warned and prepared properly - here everyone needs an
13 > EAPI5
14 > capable portage.
15 >
16
17 This seems like a great time to deprecate & remove the unmaintained server
18 profile target, as has been previously discussed. Is this doable or is
19 that another issue to be tackled another day?
20
21 -Ben Kohler

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items -- Council meeting 2013-01-08 "Tony \\\"Chainsaw\\\" Vroon" <chainsaw@g.o>