Archives
Archives
| From: | Peter Volkov <pva@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] EAPI={3,4} offset-prefix semantics mandatory? | ||
| Date: | Wed, 16 Dec 2009 08:13:36 | ||
| Message-Id: | 1260944947.29419.156.camel@tablet | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] [RFC] EAPI={3,4} offset-prefix semantics mandatory? by Fabian Groffen |
||
| 1 | В Втр, 15/12/2009 в 19:59 +0100, Fabian Groffen пишет: |
| 2 | > Should an ebuild using an EAPI that has offset-prefix support make the |
| 3 | > use of that support mandatory or optional? |
| 4 | |
| 5 | I think no. Without real testing that package works in prefix there is |
| 6 | no need to bother and create illusion that it does. |
| 7 | |
| 8 | > (I can post all the answers to the Prefix quiz) |
| 9 | |
| 10 | I think this is good idea in any case. Could you post this (on -core, of |
| 11 | course)? |
| 12 | |
| 13 | |
| 14 | -- |
| 15 | Peter. |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] EAPI={3,4} offset-prefix semantics mandatory? | Fabian Groffen <grobian@g.o> |