| 1 |
On 21 August 2013 19:28, Alexis Ballier <aballier@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> Instead of dropping them entirely to ~arch, maybe something in between |
| 4 |
> could be done: Said arches could start moving to ~arch the leaf and |
| 5 |
> less important packages. E.g. we have (had?) a lot of sparc keywords on |
| 6 |
> sound packages or ppc keywords on ocaml ones because at some point |
| 7 |
> (~10 years ago) some dev was interested in these on this architecture |
| 8 |
> but I'm pretty sure nobody uses them. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> In short: Reduce stable coverage to reduce the workload. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> Also, from what I've seen in the thread, you are talking about keywords |
| 13 |
> only, right ? Do these arches keep their stable mark in profiles.desc? |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
I am not familiar with portage internals to understand what |
| 17 |
implications will an ~arch only architecture have if marked as stable. |
| 18 |
Is there a good reason for that? |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
Regards, |
| 22 |
Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer |
| 23 |
http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang |
Archives