Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Jakub Moc <jakub@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] matrox.eclass
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 11:05:41
Message-Id: 45BC82CF.6090005@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] matrox.eclass by Alec Warner
1 Alec Warner napsal(a):
2 >
3 > See the bug? It says 'slot is being set to $KV, which breaks the
4 > metadata cache. Also, portage may fail to set $KV to a valid slot value
5 > (typically 0) and thus the package may end up with SLOT="" which is also
6 > invalid'.
7 >
8 > Thats what we are trying to fix.
9
10 There's absolutely no package that could be installed via this crappy
11 eclass, already tried to explain about 4 times but you don't listen. Oh
12 well, I give up; go fix the slot, never mind that it's utterly useless.
13
14
15 --
16 Best regards,
17
18 Jakub Moc
19 mailto:jakub@g.o
20 GPG signature:
21 http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E
22 Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95 B30F 8717 D5FD CEBA 3D9E
23
24 ... still no signature ;)

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] matrox.eclass "Bryan Østergaard" <kloeri@g.o>